luciferase assay (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Luciferase Assay, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 434 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/luciferase assay/product/R&D Systems
Average 96 stars, based on 434 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "IFIT3-DVL interaction promotes malignant progression of lung squamous cell carcinoma and large-cell lung carcinoma via canonical WNT signaling"
Article Title: IFIT3-DVL interaction promotes malignant progression of lung squamous cell carcinoma and large-cell lung carcinoma via canonical WNT signaling
Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry
doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2026.111368
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of IFIT3 on cell malignancy and canonical WNT signaling. A and B , Western blot analysis. GAPDH was an internal control. Quantitative analysis of band intensities is provided in . p-GSK-3β (Ser9), the serine nine phosphorylation of GSK-3β. C–H , quantitative real-time PCR analysis. β-actin was an internal control. Vec, vector, the control group of the IFIT3 expression plasmid. IF3, transfection of IFIT3 expression plasmid. si-IF3, siRNA-IFIT3. si-NC, siRNA-negative control, a scrambled siRNA selected as a negative control. si-IF3 (IF3), following IFIT3 knockdown with siRNA, its expression was restored by transfection with IFIT3 expression plasmid. I–K , dual-luciferase assay. IFIT3 expression plasmid or IFIT3 siRNA was transfected to LUSC/LCLC cells, with or without the treatment of recombinant WNT3A protein. (i) Negative Control: transfection of empty plasmid vector or siRNA-negative control. (ii) Positive Control: treatment of recombinant WNT3A protein. (iii) Test Group 1: transfection of IFIT3 expression plasmid or IFIT3 siRNA. (iv) Test Group 2: transfection of IFIT3 expression plasmid or IFIT3 siRNA, with the treatment of recombinant WNT3A protein. rhW3A, the cells were treated with recombinant human WNT3A protein (100 ng/ml) for 12 h. Error bars indicated mean ± SEM (n = 3). Data were analyzed by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test for ( C , D , F and G ), and one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test for ( E , H–K ). ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. LCLC, large-cell lung carcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Control, Phospho-proteomics, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Plasmid Preparation, Expressing, Transfection, Negative Control, Knockdown, Luciferase, Recombinant, Positive Control, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of IFIT3 on canonical WNT signaling. A , Western blot analysis. GAPDH was an internal control. Quantitative analysis of band intensities is provided in A . Vec, vector, is the control group of the IFIT3 expression plasmid. IF3, transfection of IFIT3 expression plasmid. After transfection with IFIT3 expression plasmid, cells were treated for 24 h with dimethyl sulfoxide (10 μM; IFIT3+ dimethyl sulfoxide group) or XAV-939 (10 μM; IFIT3+XAV-939 group). B , dual-luciferase assay. TOPFLASH/FOPFLASH was used to measure for β-catenin/TCF mediated transcriptional activity. C , nuclear and Cytoplasmic Protein Extraction Assay analysis. Cyto, cytoplasm; Nuc, nucleus; Lamin B1 was a reference nuclear protein, and α-tubulin was a positive control for the cytoplasm. Quantitative analysis of band intensities is provided in B . D , immunofluorescence analysis (the scale bar represents 10 μm). Quantification of average fluorescence intensity was provided. E , representative immunohistochemistry images for IFIT3 and β-catenin in LUSC and LCLC (magnification: × 400; the scale bar represents 50 μm). F , Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyzing the different group in cancerous samples from LUSC/LCLC patients. a, the group with cytoplasmic IFIT3 and nuclear β-catenin coexpression (16 cases); b, the group with IFIT3 and β-catenin coexpression in the cytoplasm (56 cases); c. others (110 cases). Log-rank test was used for survival comparison. Error bars indicated mean ± SEM (n = 3). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test for ( B ), and two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test for ( D ). ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. LCLC, large-cell lung carcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Expressing, Transfection, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Protein Extraction, Positive Control, Immunofluorescence, Fluorescence, Immunohistochemistry, Comparison, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: IFIT3 interacts with DVL2 to promote DVL2 phosphorylation and upregulate β-catenin expression. A , co-immunoprecipitation analysis. IP, immunoprecipitation. IB, immunoblot. B , immunofluorescence assay (the scale bar represents 50 μm). Quantitative colocalization analysis of these images is presented in . C, E and F , Western blot analysis. GAPDH was an internal control. Quantitative analysis of band intensities is provided in . p-GSK-3β (Ser9), the serine nine phosphorylation of GSK-3β. p-β-catenin (Ser675), the serine 675 phosphorylation of β-catenin. ABC, active non-phospho (Ser33/37/Thr41) β-catenin. p-DVL2 (Ser143), the serine 143 phosphorylation of DVL2. p-DVL2 (Thr224), the threonine 224 phosphorylation of DVL2. D , dual-luciferase assay. TOPFLASH/FOPFLASH was measured for β-catenin/TCF mediated transcriptional activity. Cells were co-transfected with siRNA and plasmid. Vec, vector, the control group of the IFIT3 expression plasmid. IF3, transfection of IFIT3 expression plasmid. si-D1, siRNA-DVL1. si-D2, siRNA-DVL2. si-D3, siRNA-DVL3. si-NC, siRNA-negative control, a scrambled siRNA selected as a negative control. si-IF3 (IF3), following IFIT3 knockdown with siRNA, its expression was restored by transfection with IFIT3 expression plasmid. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test for ( D ). Error bars indicated mean ± SEM (n = 3). ∗ p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Phospho-proteomics, Expressing, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Control, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Negative Control, Knockdown
